A Multidimensional Criminological Analysis of the Drug–Violence Nexus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v6i2.734Keywords:
Drug Use, Violent Crime, Drug-related Violence, Crime, Illegal Drug Market, Substance Use, Four-dimensional Drug–violence Nexus ModelAbstract
The issues of drug abuse and violent crime continue to be social, criminological and public-health problems. But a causal assumption, that drug consumption directly results in violent behavior, cannot entirely explain the relationship between drug use and violence. This study focuses on the drug–violence relationship and employ inductive qualitative analysis of secondary evidence with special emphasis upon Pakistan. The study is based on a range of peer-reviewed literature, international reports, official documents and criminological research. An interpretivism philosophy was used and an inductive qualitative documentary design to identify recurrent explanations and mechanisms in the evidence. Theories applied as lenses were classical criminological theories (Goldstein's tripartite theory, social learning theory, strain theory, social disorganization theory and routine activity theory) and not causal theories. Four dimensions are outlined pharmacological, economic, social and structural all of which are interrelated. Recent findings suggest that substance use is associated with violence, which can be positive or negative depending on the type of substance, individual characteristics, social context and illicit market conditions (Curtis et al., 2024; World Health Organization, 2024). The prevalence of drug use is also increasing globally, with an estimated 316 million drug users in 2023 (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2025). The four-dimensional drug violence nexus model has been introduced, which views violence as the product of individual, economic, social and structural mechanisms, all of which interact and act as sources of violence. These findings justify the development of a comprehensive strategy based on prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, socio-economic measures, local actions and measures taken to systematically combat drug markets.
References
Beeler, S., Gerrish, O., Aldred, B. G., & Asher BlackDeer, A. (2024). Histories of violence among clients seeking substance use disorder treatment: A systematic mapping review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1307641
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Goldstein, P. J. (1985). The drugs/Violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 15(4), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204268501500406
Lau, G., Ang, J. Y., Kim, N., Gabbe, B. J., Mitra, B., Dietze, P. M., Reeder, S., Scott, D., & Beck, B. (2023). Prevalence of alcohol and other drug use in patients presenting to hospital for violence-related injuries: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(1), 306-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221150951
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Drug use in Pakistan 2013. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved from UNODC official report (ecoi.net)
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2025). World drug report 2025. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved from UNODC World Drug Report 2025
World Health Organization. (2025). WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence: Forty-seventh report (WHO Technical Report Series No. 1065). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from WHO official publication (World Health Organization
Zhong, S., Yu, R., & Fazel, S. (2020). Drug use disorders and violence: Associations with individual drug categories. Epidemiologic Reviews, 42(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxaa006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."




