The Impact of the U.S.–China Trade Conflict on Global Supply Chains: Tariffs, Trade Diversion, and Strategic Decoupling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v6i3.762Keywords:
U.S.-China Trade Conflict, Global Supply Chains, Trade Diversion, Strategic Decoupling, Nearshoring, Export Controls, Critical Minerals, Global Value ChainsAbstract
This structured review aims to draw together the empirical and policy literature on the impact of the U.S.-China trade tensions on global supply chains from 2018 to mid-2026. It covers tariff incidence, bilateral trade, trade diversion, relocation of production, export restrictions on semiconductors, restrictions on critical minerals, agriculture and macroeconomic spillovers. The evidence examined suggests that there has been significant pass-through of U.S. tariffs to importers and downstream users and a reduction in the amount of direct U.S.–China trade in a number of tariff-sensitive industries. Many of the adjustments, however, have been geographical – moving towards “connector economies”, such as Vietnam and Mexico – but not a wholesale break from Chinese production networks. While the literature is most conclusive on tariff pass-through, bilateral trade contraction, and certain third-country gains, the findings on the effects of trade on labor markets are mixed. The findings regarding the effects of trade on labour markets are mixed, with the strongest evidence in the literature for tariff pass-through, bilateral trade contraction, and selected third-country gains. Information about the efficacy of new technology and critical-mineral controls in the long run is less developed and heavily dependent on institutional and policy information. The impact on most developing economies, such as Pakistan, is also poorly studied.The heart of the matter is that falling bilateral trade should not be confused as a sign of real diversification of supply chains. Decoupling in global production is limited by the need to continue using Chinese intermediate goods, processing capacity, technology, capital and ownership.
References
Alfaro, L., & Chor, D. (2023). Global supply chains: The looming “great reallocation” (NBER Working Paper No. 31661). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31661
Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. E. (2019). The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.187
Antràs, P., Kulesza, A., & Presbitero, A. F. (2026). The remains of the trade: The U.S.-China trade war and its aftermath [Working paper]. Harvard University. https://antras.scholars.harvard.edu/
Bown, C. P. (2019). US-China trade war tariffs: An up-to-date chart [Continuously updated chart]. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved September 15, 2026, from https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/2019/us-china-trade-war-tariffs-date-chart
Brunelli, K. (2026, June 11). Chinese customs data reveal deeper US dependence on Chinese rare earths. Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia University. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/chinese-customs-data-reveal-deeper-us-dependence-on-chinese-rare-earths/
Bureau of Industry and Security. (2025a, September 30). Expansion of end-user controls to cover affiliates of certain listed entities. Federal Register, 90, 47201–47215. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/30/2025-19001/expansion-of-end-user-controls-to-cover-affiliates-of-certain-listed-entities
Bureau of Industry and Security. (2025b, November 12). One year suspension of expansion of end-user controls for affiliates of certain listed entities. Federal Register, 90, 50928–50932. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/12/2025-19846/one-year-suspension-of-expansion-of-end-user-controls-for-affiliates-of-certain-listed-entities
Cavallo, A., Gopinath, G., Neiman, B., & Tang, J. (2021). Tariff pass-through at the border and at the store: Evidence from US trade policy. American Economic Review: Insights, 3(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190536
Clark, H. L. (2025, February 26). U.S. imports from China have fallen by less than U.S. data indicate. Liberty Street Economics, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2025/02/u-s-imports-from-china-have-fallen-by-less-than-u-s-data-indicate/
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). The return to protectionism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz036
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., Khandelwal, A. K., & Taglioni, D. (2024). The US–China trade war and global reallocations. American Economic Review: Insights, 6(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20230094
Flaaen, A., & Pierce, J. R. (2019). Disentangling the effects of the 2018–2019 tariffs on a globally connected U.S. manufacturing sector (Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-086). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2019.086
Freund, C., Mattoo, A., Mulabdic, A., & Ruta, M. (2024). Is US trade policy reshaping global supply chains? Journal of International Economics, 152, 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.104011
Gopinath, G., Gourinchas, P.-O., Presbitero, A. F., & Topalova, P. (2025). Changing global linkages: A new Cold War? Journal of International Economics, 153, 104042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.104042
Handley, K., Kamal, F., & Monarch, R. (2020). Rising import tariffs, falling export growth: When modern supply chains meet old-style protectionism (NBER Working Paper No. 26611). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26611
International Energy Agency. (2025, October 23). With new export controls on critical minerals, supply concentration risks become reality. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/with-new-export-controls-on-critical-minerals-supply-concentration-risks-become-reality
Li, S. (2026, July 27). Fact check: Are U.S. soybeans being exported to China in record numbers? EconoFact. https://econofact.org/factbrief/fact-check-are-u-s-soybeans-being-exported-to-china-in-record-numbers
Lovely, M. E., & Wan, C. Y. (2026, August 4). Years of US tariffs on China have largely failed to reduce dependence on Chinese suppliers [Chart]. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/2026/years-us-tariffs-china-have-largely-failed-reduce-dependence-chinese
Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China, & General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. (2025, April 4). Announcement No. 18 of 2025 announcing the decision to implement export control on some medium and heavy rare earth related items. https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/AnnouncementsOrders/art/2025/art_0dd87cbee7b045bf93fabe6ab2faceee.html
Morgan, S., Arita, S., Beckman, J., Ahsan, S., Russell, D., Jarrell, P., & Kenner, B. (2022). The economic impacts of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agriculture (Economic Research Report No. 304). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.327180
Office of the United States Trade Representative. (n.d.). The People's Republic of China. Retrieved September 15, 2026, from https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2025). World investment report 2025: International investment in the digital economy. United Nations. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025
White House. (2025, May 12). Joint statement on U.S.–China economic and trade meeting in Geneva. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/05/joint-statement-on-u-s-china-economic-and-trade-meeting-in-geneva/
World Bank. (n.d.). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) [Data set]. World Development Indicators. Retrieved September 15, 2026, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
